Posts by Collection

paper_reviews

Federated Balanced Learning, CVPR 2026

3 minute read

Reviewed:

federated-learning paper-review

기존 연구들은 Non-IID를 최적화 단계(그래디언트/손실함수 수정)에서 문제를 해결하려 노력함 → Model drift 가 발생된 것을 교정하려는 시도, 근본적 문제(샘플의 불균형)을 해결하는 것이 아님

Logit-Gap Steering: Efficient Short-Suffix Jailbreaks for Aligned Large Language Models — Li & Liu (2025), arXiv

4 minute read

Reviewed:

importance-high llm-safety paper-review status-in-progress

📎 arXiv:2506.24056 저자: Tung-Ling Li, Hongliang Liu 우리 논문과의 관계: 우리의 $St = \mu{cmp} - \mu{ref}$와 거의 동일한 logit-gap 정의를 공격에 사용. 우리는 진단에 사용. 같은 metric, 반대 목적. “Diagnostic vs. interventional” 구분의 핵심 사례.

Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Direction — Arditi et al. (2024), NeurIPS 2024

4 minute read

Reviewed:

importance-high llm-safety paper-review status-in-progress

📎 NeurIPS 2024 · arXiv:2406.11717 저자: Andy Arditi, Oscar Obeso, Aaquib Syed, Daniel Paleka, Nina Panickssery, Wes Gurnee, Neel Nanda 우리 논문과의 관계: Representation-level에서의 safety 분석. 우리의 temporal construct validity 실험에서 이 refusal direction과 $St$의 step별 상관을…

Refusal Falls off a Cliff: How Safety Alignment Fails in Reasoning? — Yin et al. (2025), ICLR 2026 Withdrawn Submission

4 minute read

Reviewed:

importance-high llm-safety paper-review status-in-progress

📎 arXiv:2510.06036 (ICLR 2026 Withdrawn Submission) 저자: Qingyu Yin, Chak Tou Leong, Linyi Yang, Wenxuan Huang, Wenjie Li, Xiting Wang, et al. 우리 논문과의 관계: 가장 직접적인 “temporal safety” 비교 대상. 그들은 reasoning chain 수준, 우리는 token generation 수준에서 temporal dynamics를…

SafeDecoding: Defending against Jailbreak Attacks via Safety-Aware Decoding — Xu et al. (2024), ACL 2024

4 minute read

Reviewed:

importance-high llm-safety paper-review status-in-progress

📎 ACL 2024 · arXiv:2402.08983 저자: Zhangchen Xu, Fengqing Jiang, Luyao Niu, Jinyuan Jia, Bill Yuchen Lin, Radha Poovendran 우리 논문과의 관계: 우리의 ⁍가 실제 방어 시스템의 trigger로 활용될 수 있는 구체적 예시. SafeDecoding = “how to intervene”, 우리 = “when and where to intervene”.

Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To! (Shallow Alignment) — Qi et al. (2024), ICLR 2024

4 minute read

Reviewed:

importance-high llm-safety paper-review status-in-progress

📎 ICLR 2024 · arXiv:2310.03693 저자: Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng, Tinghao Xie, Pin-Yu Chen, Ruoxi Jia, Prateek Mittal, Peter Henderson 우리 논문과의 관계: early-k 결과의 이론적 근거. “alignment은 shallow하다”는 주장 → 우리가 “얼마나 shallow한지” 정량적 logit-level 증거를 제공.

portfolio

publications

talks

teaching

Teaching experience 1

Undergraduate course, University 1, Department, 2014

This is a description of a teaching experience. You can use markdown like any other post.

Teaching experience 2

Workshop, University 1, Department, 2015

This is a description of a teaching experience. You can use markdown like any other post.